PDA

View Full Version : all computer people do me a favor



SaintHax
09-30-2004, 03:27 AM
ping this IP 69.56.238.122 and this IP 63.247.94.13 and tell me what lowest ms response you get for each one.


I'm deciding on how to increase performance for the site :cool:

Louis85
09-30-2004, 09:09 AM
51 for the first IP and 25 for the second. The averages for both were higher, do you care about that? If so avg. 55ms for the first, 42 for the second.

Chukwuka
09-30-2004, 09:32 AM
Originally posted by SaintHax@Sep 30 2004, 02:27 AM
ping this IP 69.56.238.122 and this IP 63.247.94.13 and tell me what lowest ms response you get for each one.

How do you "ping"?

Etherspin
09-30-2004, 10:15 AM
i just wanna know where it went in xp !! i havent used ping since windows 98 :)

Brian221
09-30-2004, 11:13 AM
Pings Screenshot (http://www.pmdawn.net/brian221/crap/pings.jpg)

-Kosh-
09-30-2004, 11:14 AM
bring up a command prompt (winXP: START->RUN->"cmd") and type "PING put.ip.address.here" and press ENTER.

to leave the command prompt, type "exit" and press ENTER

Chukwuka
09-30-2004, 11:16 AM
Originally posted by Brian221@Sep 30 2004, 10:13 AM

Pings Screenshot (http://www.pmdawn.net/brian221/crap/pings.jpg)
Sorry Brian

Call me comp-illeterate!!!
I don't understand that!! I should, butttttttttttttt I don't!!
Xplane!!

Chukwuka
09-30-2004, 11:18 AM
Originally posted by -Kosh-@Sep 30 2004, 10:14 AM
bring up a command prompt (winXP: START->RUN->"cmd") and type "PING put.ip.address.here" and press ENTER.

to leave the command prompt, type "exit" and press ENTER
Gotcha!!

-Kosh-
09-30-2004, 11:24 AM
Originally posted by Chukwuka@Sep 30 2004, 10:16 AM
Sorry Brian

Call me comp-illeterate!!!
I don't understand that!! I should, butttttttttttttt I don't!!
Xplane!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ping

:D

Chukwuka
09-30-2004, 11:35 AM
You're the man, -Kosh-

Harmeister
09-30-2004, 11:55 AM
Z:\>ping 69.56.238.122

Pinging 69.56.238.122 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 69.56.238.122: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=53
Reply from 69.56.238.122: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=53
Reply from 69.56.238.122: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=53
Reply from 69.56.238.122: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 69.56.238.122:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 51ms, Maximum = 52ms, Average = 51ms

Z:\>ping 63.247.94.13

Pinging 63.247.94.13 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 63.247.94.13: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=239
Reply from 63.247.94.13: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=239
Reply from 63.247.94.13: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=239
Reply from 63.247.94.13: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=239

Ping statistics for 63.247.94.13:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 27ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 28ms

fd
09-30-2004, 01:23 PM
Pinging 69.56.238.122 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 69.56.238.122: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=52
Reply from 69.56.238.122: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=52
Reply from 69.56.238.122: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=52
Reply from 69.56.238.122: bytes=32 time=159ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 69.56.238.122:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 129ms, Maximum = 159ms, Average = 137ms

C:\Documents and Settings\FD>PING 63.247.94.13

Pinging 63.247.94.13 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 63.247.94.13: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=246
Reply from 63.247.94.13: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=246
Reply from 63.247.94.13: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=246
Reply from 63.247.94.13: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 63.247.94.13:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 109ms, Maximum = 119ms, Average = 111ms

C:\Documents and Settings\FD>

Chukwuka
09-30-2004, 01:43 PM
Microsoft® Windows DOS
©Copyright Microsoft Corp 1990-2001.

U:\>ping 69.56.238.122

Pinging 69.56.238.122 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 69.56.238.122: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=56
Reply from 69.56.238.122: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=56
Reply from 69.56.238.122: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=56
Reply from 69.56.238.122: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 69.56.238.122:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 12ms

U:\>ping 63.247.94.13

Pinging 63.247.94.13 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 63.247.94.13: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=239
Reply from 63.247.94.13: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=239
Reply from 63.247.94.13: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=239
Reply from 63.247.94.13: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=239

Ping statistics for 63.247.94.13:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 48ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 48ms

U:\>

byrdie
10-01-2004, 01:40 AM
Somehow, I suspect that this won't come as much of a surprise:


I:\Documents and Settings\byrdie>ping 69.56.238.122

Pinging 69.56.238.122 with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 69.56.238.122:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms


I:\Documents and Settings\byrdie>ping 63.247.94.13

Pinging 63.247.94.13 with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 63.247.94.13:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

I:\Documents and Settings\byrdie>

SaintHax
10-01-2004, 01:59 AM
what the hell...you're on the forum but you can't ping a server in either datacenter...you're ISP must block ICMP

byrdie
10-02-2004, 06:20 PM
Originally posted by SaintHax@Sep 30 2004, 09:59 PM
what the hell...you're on the forum but you can't ping a server in either datacenter...you're ISP must block ICMP
Or, it simply didn't occur to me that being behind a household firewall would affect pinging. whoops. Maybe I'm not really a computer person. I assumed that knowing what "ping" meant helped me rate. Heck, I just figured that by the time I saw your request, you'd pulled the sites down for maintainence ... which would be interesting as I'd been logged on shortly thereafter. :tinker:

*cough*

The resident computer guru provided me with the following from his much more useful session:$ uname -a
Linux www.llamacom.com 2.4.21-15.0.2.EL #1 Wed Jun 16 23:12:30 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

$ ping 69.56.238.122
PING 69.56.238.122 (69.56.238.122) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 69.56.238.122: icmp_seq=0 ttl=54 time=56.0 ms
64 bytes from 69.56.238.122: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=57.9 ms
64 bytes from 69.56.238.122: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=55.4 ms
64 bytes from 69.56.238.122: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=56.1 ms
64 bytes from 69.56.238.122: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=71.9 ms
64 bytes from 69.56.238.122: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=74.8 ms
64 bytes from 69.56.238.122: icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=55.5 ms

--- 69.56.238.122 ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6057ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 55.424/61.118/74.832/7.825 ms, pipe 2
$ ping 63.247.94.13
PING 63.247.94.13 (63.247.94.13) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 63.247.94.13: icmp_seq=0 ttl=245 time=61.5 ms
64 bytes from 63.247.94.13: icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=66.1 ms
64 bytes from 63.247.94.13: icmp_seq=2 ttl=245 time=60.7 ms
64 bytes from 63.247.94.13: icmp_seq=3 ttl=245 time=61.2 ms
64 bytes from 63.247.94.13: icmp_seq=4 ttl=245 time=59.5 ms

--- 63.247.94.13 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4040ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 59.574/61.854/66.179/2.268 ms, pipe 2Hope this helps, late though it is.